The jump to the 12nm process with the RTX 2060 was less extreme, but here we got an entirely new architecture. The 980 Ti was a beast of a GPU, it shared the same 601mm2 die with the Titan X and although not all SM units were enabled, it still packed an impressive 2816 CUDA cores, 6GB of GDDR5 memory on a 384-bit wide memory bus, and enjoyed a memory bandwidth of 336.5 GB/s.Ī year later the GTX 1070 arrived and although it packed just 1920 CUDA cores - 32% fewer than the 980 Ti - thanks to a ~60% increase in clock speed, performance ended up being very similar and this was largely due to Nvidia moving from TSMC's 28nm process to what at the time was their latest 16nm manufacturing. That makes the modern Turing GPU three and a half years newer and almost 50% cheaper. The GTX 980 Ti was released back in mid-2015 for $650 and the RTX 2060 in early 2019 for $350. It will be interesting to see if those margins have changed, while also taking a look at how much faster the RTX 2060 is when compared to the GTX 980 Ti. We didn't include older GPUs at the time like the GTX 980 Ti, so the Maxwell-based flagship was absent from that feature. Looking back at that data, we found that the RTX 2060 was able to beat the GTX 1070 Ti by a slim margin, making it 13% faster than the vanilla GTX 1070. We happened to miss the official launch because Nvidia "lost" our sample in the mail but that meant we didn't have to rush our tests and we ended up with the full hog and provided a massive 36 game test. RTX 2060 test.Ībout a year ago we reviewed the RTX 2060 for the first time. So in a way we suppose you could call this more of a GTX 980 Ti vs. We're particularly interested to see how it performs against more modern GPUs like the GTX 1070 and the GeForce RTX 2060. Today we're revisiting an old friend, the GeForce GTX 980 Ti and we're doing so with a 36 game benchmark covering the 1080p and 1440p resolutions.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |